.

NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT

"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts

Monday, May 7, 2018

"We Are Building A Christian Democracy" says Hungarian PM


The Holy Crown of Hungary along with other regalia.

Hungary Fights Muslim Immigration


BUDAPEST (Reuters) - After an election victory built on a fierce anti-migrant campaign, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Friday said his new government would soon bring forward tighter immigration rules.

He also named Interior Minister Sandor Pinter and Economy Minister Mihaly Varga as deputy prime ministers and gave notice he would take a tough stance against the European Union over the bloc’s next budget.

Orban was re-elected in an April landslide that gave his ruling Fidesz party a two-thirds parliamentary majority, enabling it to rewrite major laws.

One of the most vociferous opponents of Muslim immigration into Europe, Orban won a third term in power after his campaign resonated with large swathes of the electorate, particularly in rural areas.

He told public radio that his main political objectives were unchanged.

“We are building a Christian democracy,” Orban said. “An old-style Christian democracy rooted in European traditions, where human dignity is paramount and there is a separation of powers.”

“We will defend Christian culture and will not surrender the country to aliens,” Orban said.

Read More . . . .

Muslim Janissaries were the elite infantry units of the Ottoman Empire and were used to attack and conquer Christian nations..
.
Battle of Mohács

The Religion of Peace™

kk
Today Islam is conquering Europe through immigration.  But in 1526 a Muslim army of 70,000 men invaded central Europe slaughtering the Christian 30,000 man army of Hungary.
.
The Christian people of Hungary were absorbed into the Muslim Ottoman Empire and forced to live as second class citizens in their own nation.
k

Then came Muslim immigration. There were approximately 80,000 Muslim settlers in Ottoman-controlled territory of Hungary; being mainly administrators, soldiers, artisans and merchants of Crimean Tatar origin.

.
Read More:
kk
Muslim Ottoman Hungary

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Mark Levin: US Senate Has No Purpose Since Adoption of 17th Amendment



Mark Levin is Wrong Again

“Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” 
James Madison

Federalist Papers Nos. 10 and 51


  • Ratings mean everything.  Never Trumper Mark Levin blasts the Senate for not supporting Trump. Unless you want to lose your radio audience you now need to look like you support Trump even if it means opposing the Constitution.
  • Sorry Mark but the Founders allowed for amendments to the Constitution like allowing Blacks and women to vote etc. Direct elections of Senators is a fact of life. Deal with it.
  • As usual Levin misses a major point of the Constitution - the division of power to help prevent dictatorships. An independent Senate has specific Constitutional rolls to play.


(CNS News)  -  On his nationally syndicated radio talk show Monday, host Mark Levin blasted the Senate for its reluctance to confirm Mike Pompeo as Secretary of State, suggesting that the U.S. Senate has no purpose since the adoption of the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“[W]hat is the purpose of the United States Senate?” asked Mark Levin. “Once the 17th Amendment was adopted and senators were elected directly as opposed to from state legislatures, what is the purpose of the United States Senate? They say it’s the most deliberative body. It’s not the most deliberative body. They don’t debate amendments to bills. They didn’t even debate the spending bill six weeks ago, five weeks ago. The United States Senate has no purpose since the 17th Amendment.”

Below is a transcript of Levin’s comments from his show on Monday evening:
“To attempt to deny a president his nominee for secretary of state, the oldest cabinet position, makes me call into question – and I’m going to tell you this quite seriously – what is the purpose of the United States Senate? Once the 17th Amendment was adopted and senators were elected directly as opposed to from state legislatures, what is the purpose of the United States Senate? They say it’s the most deliberative body. It’s not the most deliberative body. They don’t debate amendments to bills. They didn’t even debate the spending bill six weeks ago, five weeks ago. The United States Senate has no purpose since the 17th Amendment.
“The initial purpose of the United States Senate was to represent the views of the states. The Framers of the Constitution set up this bicameral body: The House of Representatives, directly elected every two years, every member – there’s your democracy – and the United States Senate to represent the priorities of the states.
 
“Today these senators go in any direction they want to. Most of them spend their time in the Senate positioning themselves for higher office, president or vice president. Others decide to make a career of it and stay there 30, 40 years.
“None of this would be taking place if the states could function through the Congress as was intended by the Framers.
“So, the states have no say in the federal government or in federal legislation, no say.
“And the Senate is the most bizarre institution of any institution of governance. It doesn’t really have a purpose in my view.”
Read More . . . .

  Federal Senate of Brazil
kk
The Senate
Dividing Power to Protect Freedom

kk
James Madison said, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” 

As new Republics established themselves one of their first acts was to follow Madison's advice and divide legislative power into two branches: a lower and an upper house to try and prevent a concentration of power. 
jj
The Senate of Brazil is a good example. Their Senate is comprised of 81 seats. Three Senators from each of the 26 states and three Senators from the Federal District are elected on a majority basis to serve eight-year terms. Elections are staggered so that two-thirds of the upper house is up for election at one time and the remaining one-third four years later. When one seat is up for election in each State, each voter casts one vote for the Senate; when two seats are up for election, each voter casts two votes
kk
Upper Houses Around The World
kk
Japan - House of Councillors
kk
Senate of Australia
kk
Senate of the Republic of Italy
kk
Rajya Sabha of India


Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Communists Bar Pro-Democracy Election Candidate


Agnes Chow, a Demosisto candidate who was barred from forthcoming elections to Hong Kong's Legislative Council (LegCo), addresses a crowd on Jan. 28, 2018.

Communism
Crushing Freedom Since 1917


(Radio Free Asia)  -  Hong Kong authorities have banned a key member of the pro-democracy party Demosisto, which was formed by the leaders of the 2014 Occupy Central movement, from standing in a forthcoming by-election to the city’s legislature, sparking outrage among the pan-democratic camp and some legal analysts.

A group of senior lawyers, all of whom are members of the city government’s Chief Executive Election Committee said that the refusal of Agnes Chow’s candidacy for forthcoming elections to the Legislative Council (LegCo) had infringed her fundamental rights, and was a matter of “deep regret and concern.”

The bar on Chow is significant, because it sets a precedent for direct influence on the selection of Hong Kong election candidates according to Beijing’s wishes, casting serious doubts on promises of “a high degree of autonomy” made to the former British colony before the 1997 handover to Chinese rule.


The move prompted thousands of people to gather outside government headquarters late on Sunday in protest at the decision by the Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC) to disqualify Chow, 21, a prominent member of the Demosistō party, from the March by-election.

The EAC told Chow that her candidacy for the Hong Kong Island constituency election was rejected because her party supports self-determination for Hong Kong, local media reported.

Some 2,000 protesters gathered in Civic Square, chanting slogans and carrying placards that read “Hongkong people want Plan A,” in a reference to the fully democratic elections that were denied to the city by Beijing, sparking the Occupy Central movement.

“No disqualification! No to rule by officials!” they shouted.

“I support electoral freedom for Hong Kong,” a protester surnamed Dong told RFA. “Everyone should have the right to stand for elections, and shouldn’t be able to have that right taken from them by any government.”

“This is a very serious situation; a crisis,” she said. Chow described the decision against her as the political liquidation of a whole generation.

“This decision to disqualify me is tantamount to permanently removing the rights of not just me but many other people in Hong Kong to take part in politics,” Chow said. “From now on, the government is saying that the people of Hong Kong will no longer be allowed to vote according to their wishes.”

“Beijing and the Hong Kong government have, politically speaking, wiped out an entire generation,” she said. “It is clear that the government wants to obliterate us.”

The Hong Kong government has backed the EAC’s decision, saying that anyone wishing to run for LegCo must obey the city’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law.


Read More . . . .


Monday, November 6, 2017

Porn star to run against Putin in Russian elections



Suddenly Elections Are
Much More Interesting


(Daily Mail)  -  An ex-Russian porn star is the latest woman to announce she'll be standing against President Putin in next year's presidential elections.

Busty brunette Elena Berkova from the city of Murmansk in northwest Russia, who also stood for mayor of Sochi, posted a video on Instagram outlining her plans.

The 32-year-old mum-of-two, who will be the fourth female candidate to run for office, said she would introduce the death penalty for sexual harassment because she was fed up with people like Harvey Weinstein.

She also said she would make it almost impossible for men to divorce, introduce sex education in schools, and make it an offence to wear a skirt longer than 40cm.


The model who is known for posting saucy videos on social media said: 'I made this decision recently, because women are actively taking part in the presidential campaign.

'Some of them are from show business, I ran for mayor of Sochi and took have taken part in politics, so I decided to run for the President of Russia.

'I plan to make divorces almost impossible for men, as these days women bear almost all the responsibility for children.

'I plan to introduce sexual and legal education in schools. And to introduce a mandatory sex exam. 

'Often our youth still do not know about sexual legal norms, hygiene, not to mention pleasure.'

She added: 'Censorship on clothes. For example - a violation of public order should be wearing a skirt above 40cm.'

And she calls for strong laws to cut down on sexual harassment. 

'The death penalty for harassment. We've got the Weinsteins, too.'

Her campaign has been met with mixed reactions from her 639,000 followers.

Read More . . .




Monday, October 2, 2017

POLICE STATE Crackdown in Spain - "Democracy" in an illusion






By Gary;

The more things change the more they stay the same.

90% of Catalans voted for freedom, so the All-Powerful State beats the living crap out of the people for daring to vote in an election.

Democracy?  Just more bullshit and lies from the Elites.

The Spanish police are no different that those in any other nation or at any other time in history. They will crush whatever group their Masters tell them to crush in order to protect the status quo be it monarchy, Islamist state or Communist dictatorship.

I believe this violent police crackdown on a peaceful and free election is a Boston Tea Party moment for Catalonia.  Fence sitters on the subject of independence will now join the movement.

The Catalans, who have their own regional government based in Barcelona, have a troubled relationship with Spain, which violently stripped away their autonomy and attempted to stamp out their language during the Franco years, as well as settling hundreds of thousands of outsiders in the region to try and dilute its sense of national identity during the Franco years.

So we see Spanish riot police aggressively suppressing a self-determination referendum on independence for Catalonia, which Madrid says “runs counter to the goals and ideals of the European Union”.

There are only three options for Spain:

  • Rule with the consent of the governed
  • Rule with jack boots, tear gas and fear
  • or grant independence.

I cannot see Spain allowing the Catalans freedom. So watch for a Police State style rule over the province and perhaps revolution.




Suffer for democracy. Police crackdown

Beating people for daring to vote






Obey Your Masters
Spanish riot police shoots rubber bullet straight
at people trying to reach a voting site.



Monday, February 20, 2017

Our Best and Worst Presidents



My President's Day Review
The best, the worst and why did 
they even bother to run?



By Gary;

With this President's Day there have been the usual assorted annual reviews and rankings of our Presidents.

So I thought I would put out my own ranking of the five best and five worst Presidents.

Ranking is not that easy. Each President came from different times and faced completely different issues.

The Best Presidents

1) George Washington

This is almost a no brainer. In my mind Washington was the greatest man in all of recorded history. Period.

He lived in a world of savage dictators who all claimed to be anointed by God himself. Speak out against them and you would be tortured or executed.

Democracy, even Republics, did not exist. The closest thing out there was the oligarchical Republic of Venice. Our Founders had to go back to the ancient Republic of Rome for a guide to build a new nation.

Washington was there at every step fighting in the front lines against the corrupt Monarchists in battle, building a nation with a new Constitution and then serving as the first President.

General Washington could have followed in the footsteps of others and declared himself King or President-for-Life. The fact that he always refused ultimate power is what sets him up above all other leaders in history.


2) Abraham Lincoln

Mountains of books have been written about Lincoln and for good reason.  Once Washington established our Republic no other President has faced the tests Lincoln dealt with every day of his term.

There is little more that I could add to what so many have written.


3) Theodore Roosevelt

Where does one start?  The man was a whirlwind of actions and ideas.

Warrior, cowboy, police commissioner, Governor, author, reformer, trust buster, Nobel Peace Prize winner and President.

So much of modern America starts with TR from the park system to the Pure Food and Drug Act to breaking up corporations.

This last item is near to my heart these days as unelected huge multi-national corporations literally buy and sell members of Congress and candidates for President like loaves of bread.


4) James K. Polk

A close ally of Andrew Jackson, James "Young Hickory" Polk has to rank in any top five list of Presidents but is always ignored.

Polk came to the White House with strong background: member of the Tennessee Legislature, Congressman, Speaker of the House and Governor.

As President he pledged to serve only one term and looked to accomplish four main goals:


  • Reestablish the Independent Treasury System.
  • Reduce tariffs.
  • Acquire some or all of Oregon Country.
  • Acquire California and New Mexico from Mexico.

  • Polk accomplished his four major objectives in just four years. By linking acquisition of new lands in Oregon (with no slavery) and Texas (with slavery), he hoped to satisfy both North and South.

    Polk was a massive success by any possible measurement.


    5) Franklin D. Roosevelt

    FDR ended Prohibition. That is reason enough to be at #5. Bless him.

    I rank FDR lower than Polk because so much of his first two terms failed to end the Great Depression and his scheme to pack the Supreme Court smacked of Fascism. His rise to #5 ranking is based almost totally on the wars against Imperial Japan and the Axis Powers.

    Much of the New Deal's "radical" banking reforms are today viewed as common sense. Roosevelt signed the Glass–Steagall Act that created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to underwrite savings deposits. The Act also limited the ability of bankers to speculate in the stock market with their deposits. Banks were failing left and right. The Act helped provide banking and economic stability for decades to come.

    Other programs like Social Security, the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Rural Electrification Act set the stage for modern America. The nation never again looked back to laissez faire.

    His leadership in World War II is obvious. The total defeat of Imperial Japan, Germany and Italy were enormous accomplishments.

    Based on pre-1930s technology an argument could be made that these overseas wars were none of our business. But today we know about the Japanese nuclear weapon program and the German nuclear weapon project.  If either of those nations had built the atomic bomb first the entire course of history would have changed.

    FDR's victory came none too soon.

    Presidents 6 to 10

    Dwight Eisenhower, Andrew Jackson, Harry Truman, James Monroe and Ronald Reagan.

    President James Buchanan
    A former Federalist Party Congressman

    The Worst Presidents

    Because of the Civil War everyone wants to dump on President James Buchanan making him the worst President.

    To me Buchanan was helpless. In the wrong place at the wrong time. The rabid and hateful forces for and against slavery would not listen to anything resembling reason. Both sides wanted blood.

    As a "madman", general and a southerner Andrew Jackson held off the Civil War by threatening to march south and hang traitors. Buchanan was a northerner with no influence in the south and little influence in the rabid anti-slavery Republican north. So I give Buchanan a pass for being the worst President.

    5) Woodrow Wilson

    Wilson was a disaster on almost every front. He took power away from the U.S. Treasury and handed it over to the private Federal Reserve. Wilson cracked down on freedom of speech and even imprisoned Presidential candidate Eugene Debs. A new low for democracy. He also was openly racist and appointed segregationists to his cabinet.

    Foreign affairs were even worse. Without a declaration of war Wilson invaded Mexico and occupied Veracruz.

    U.S. involvement in World War I made matters worse. Instead of forcing the Europeans to solve their own problems U.S. intervention allowed France, Britain and Italy to destroy the German and Austrian Empires. The resulting power vacuum created economic and political anarchy and the rise of Fascism in nation after nation.

    4) Warren Harding

    At the time of his death, Harding was one of the most popular presidents, but the subsequent exposure of scandals that took place under his administration, such as Teapot Dome, eroded his popular regard, as did revelations of an affair by Nan Britton, one of his mistresses.


    3) George W. Bush

    God, to think I voted for this dumb bastard. By 2003 he had driven me out of the "small government" GOP.

    Where do you start?  The fake weapons of mass destruction. The creation of a 1984 Police Surveillance State.  The endless and useless wars.  Torture.  The massive expansion of government in all areas including "No Child Left Behind". Jobs shipped to Asia.  Wide open borders for legals and illegals alike.  Racking up trillions in new debt.

    But worst of all the total incompetence of the GOP causing a second Great Depression that we are still trying to climb out of.

    There was no oversight in any way, shape or form of the criminals on Wall Street who collapsed the entire economy with fake "investments" and real estate loans backed by NOTHING. Millions of home foreclosure, business failures everywhere and the rise of middle class poverty.

    Bush should have been run out of town on a rail.

    2) Herbert Hoover

    Hoovervilles. That really says it all.

    Hoover and laissez faire GOP policies stood by while banks failed, businesses failed, people lost their homes and the entire nation entered the pure Hell of the Great Depression.

    1)  Worst President Ever  -  Jimmy Carter

    Carter is the best ex-President ever by building homes for the poor. Meanwhile Bill Clinton and George W. Bush have lined their pockets with millions in corporate "speaking fees" which are better known as retroactive bribes.

    A plus is the peace Carter brokered between Egypt and Israel still holds to this day.

    The steaming pile of crap smell comes from ultra weak policies making him out to be nearly clueless.

    Carter's tenure was a time of continuing inflation and recession, as well as an energy crisis. Carter delivered a televised speech declaring that the U.S. energy crisis during the 1970s was the moral equivalent of war and wore sweaters to offset turning down the heat in the White House.

    The Soviets invaded Afghanistan (they can have it in my opinion), but Carter's brave stand was to pull out of the Olympics ruining the careers of athletes.  Carter initiated a program to arm the mujahideen through Pakistan's ISI and secured a pledge from Saudi Arabia to match U.S. funding for this purpose.  

    Carter arming Islamists. We know how well that turned out in the end.

    Then came the Iranian hostage crisis with the government held up to the world as helpless.

    Sorry Jimmy.  But you are still the best at being the worst.



    Monday, December 19, 2016

    2.4 million Californians REFUSED to vote for U.S. Senate



    The People's Republic of California

    • Last month yet another phony pretend election was held where California voters are given the "choice" between a Leftist open borders Democrat for Senate or a Leftist open borders Democrat for Senate.
    • Under California's corrupt top two primary system all small opposition political parties and independent candidates have been banned from the ballot.  You are allowed to vote only for the parties the special interest Elites allow you to vote for and your write-in vote has been declared illegal. In this case even a GOP candidate did not make it to the general election.
    • Millions of voters, including myself, did the only thing we could do, scream fuck you and leave that office blank on the ballot.


    (Ballot Access News)  -  The California Statement of Votes for November 2016 is here. On page three, one sees that 14,610,509 ballots were cast. 
    A few pages later, one sees the returns for U.S. Senate. Only 12,244,170 votes were cast for that office. This means that 2,366,339 voters cast a ballot, but did not vote for U.S. Senate. They represent 16.2% of all ballots.
    There is always some drop-off between votes cast for President and votes cast for U.S. Senate, but 16.2% is very large and probably unprecedented in California. U.S. Senate is immediately below President on the ballot. The cause of this drop-off is surely that only two Democrats were on the ballot for U.S. Senate, with no write-in space.
    The last time California had a U.S. Senate election and a presidential election in the same year, in which the top-two system did not exist, was 2004. In 2004, the drop-off was only 4.3%. 
    In 2004 the number of ballots was 12,589,683, and the number of votes for U.S. Senate was 12,053,293. In 2004 voters had a choice of five candidates, and write-in space.
    Read More . . . .

    One-Party Rule
    Other countries where only one party is on the ballot include Communist North Korea, Communist China, Communist Vietnam and Communist Cuba.
    .
    Now the People's Republic of California joins their overseas Brothers in holding mock, pretend elections.

    Wednesday, December 14, 2016

    Muslims try Christian Governor for "Blasphemy"


    Jakarta's Governor sits on the defendant's chair at the start of his
    trial hearing at North Jakarta District Court

    The Islamo-Fascist Police State


    (UK Telegraph)  -  Jakarta’s Christian governor, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, wept in court on Tuesday, during a blasphemy trial that is being seen as a test of religious tolerance in the world’s most populous Muslim country, Indonesia.

    Purnama, known by his nickname Ahok, stands accused of insulting Islam on the campaign trail in September after he told voters they should not believe religious leaders who used a specific verse in the Koran to claim that Muslims should not be led by non-Muslims.

    He has since repeatedly apologised for his statements, which provoked public anger. In his opening statement in court, he insisted his comments were aimed at politicians “incorrectly” using the verse and denied any intention to offend.

    “As a person who grew up in Islamic circles, it is not possible for me to insult Islam,” he said, stressing his great respect for the Muslim religion.

    “I did not intend to misinterpret Surah Al Maidah 51 [the verse], nor commit blasphemy,” he told the judges, breaking down in tears. “In my statement, I referred to certain politicians who had misused Surah Al Maidah 51 to avoid fair competition prior to upcoming regional elections,” said Purnama.

    The governor, a Christian and member of the country’s ethnic Chinese minority, is an anomaly as the first non-Muslim leader of Indonesia’s sprawling capital, Jakarta, in over 50 years.

    Read More . . . .


    Tuesday, December 6, 2016

    Should Hollywood Select Our Presidents? - Popular vote vs Electoral College



    Fact of the Week
    Los Angeles (Hollywood) and New York City 
    gave Hillary Clinton her entire margin 
    of victory in the popular vote. 




    By Gary;

    We have NEVER been a democracy. Sometimes I wonder if we are even a republic . . . but I digress.

    As we know an Electoral College of Sovereign States, not the people, elect the President.

    The debate rages on abolishing the Electoral College in favor of a popular vote of all the people.

    Don't feel left out if your vote does not count. Looking around the world many democratic nations do not have voters elect their leaders.  Parliaments elect the leaders of nations like Canada, Britain, Japan, Israel, Australia and India.

    On the other hand, the direct election of Presidents exists in France, Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, Kenya, South Korea, Taiwan, Argentina, Colombia and more.

    The U.S. does indeed stand alone with a system that no one these days would deliberately choose.

    Democracy vs. Federalism

    Our system is a relic of a very brief moment in time. When the Constitution was written Monarchy was the standard of government. The mass voting of a population simple did not exist. Thus came the Electoral College to fill that gap.

    If the Constitution has been written just 20 years later I doubt the College would have even been bothered with.

    So what to do today?    Is every citizen equal? Do states have rights? Why should states have rights?

    For many, many elections the country has been divided nearly 50/50. But voting patterns are not equal. The ultra landslide numbers in just Los Angeles and New York City can literally elect a President.

    Is it right for two cities alone to decide the direction of a nation that is otherwise equally divided?

    The debate goes on.

    Los Angeles County Election Results
    Nationwide the Hildabeast got 2.6 million more popular votes 
    that Trump.  Los Angeles County and New York City alone 
    gave Hillary 3.18 million votes.

    New York City Election Results
    Ultra mega landslides in just two urban areas gave Clinton 
    her entire popular vote victory.
    .
    Should just two American cities dictate
    who is President of an entire nation?
    .


    Tuesday, September 27, 2016

    No one has a clue who won the Presidential debate



    A Winner? No One Knows




    By Gary;

    The dirty little secret of this thing we call "democracy" is elections are decided by people who could care less about public affairs.

    I was camping this last weekend with a group. Try as I might many of the folks I spoke with did not have a clue what the Hell was happening in the world.

    Talking to friends about NSA spying or the CIA running guns to Islamists got reactions ranging from "Get the Hell away from me" to "I don't believe you."

    Simply, people only hear what they want to hear and block out all other data.

    It is not that people are stupid (though I am open to that argument), rather they simply don't give a crap about the world outside their front door. As long as there is beer in the fridge, hot pizza and a game on TV the big events of the world have little to no interest to them.

    So as to the debate. I felt Trump was a bit off his game and the Hildabeast did not have a seizure on live TV.

    And there I stop because it does not matter what I say or what the Talking Heads say.

    Sadly the debate largely does not matter. The election will be decided by voters who could not find Syria on a map and who think NAFTA is a new brand of coffee.

    The uninformed will elect the next President.

    How those people living in their isolated bubble view the debate and the election is beyond my power to fathom.




    A
    Perhaps the best appeal ever

    Tuesday, September 20, 2016

    Putin's Party Wins Big Majority in Russian Parliamentary Elections


    Sure Putin is authoritarian, but when has Russia NOT been authoritarian?


    “Does Russia have democracy?,” Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich, 63, said before voting. “Maybe. Probably we have some kind of democracy. I don’t know, I haven’t seen any other kind.”


    (ABC News)  -  Russian President Vladimir Putin’s party has won national parliamentary elections with a significantly increased majority, a result that cements Putin's total control over the country's political life and which potentially grants him the ability to change Russia's constitution. 
    With 93% of the vote counted, the party, United Russia, was shown to have taken 343 of 450 seats in the lower house of parliament, a sizable increase on its previous 238 seats.
    The vote was marked by an exceptionally low turnout of just 40 percent, illustrating a sense among many Russians that the election was of little importance in a country where the Kremlin determines all major policy decisions and elections are seen as stage-managed.

    Still, the result reinforced the political system engineered by the Kremlin under Putin over the past 16 years. The two parties that took second and third place are nominally in opposition to the Russian leader but in practice almost invariably support the Kremlin line. 

    Reflecting the strength of nationalist feeling in Russia following the seizure of Crimea, the ultra-nationalist Liberal Democratic Party came second to United Russia with around 15 percent of the vote, a strong showing for the party that is led by Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a man regularly described as Russia’s Donald Trump.

    Russia’s Communist Party came a close third, while the anti-Putin opposition failed to break the 5% barrier to enter parliament, losing its only lawmaker there. The win gives United Russia a two-thirds majority that allows it to amend the constitution.
    United Russia's head, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev declared victory and Putin congratulated the party, saying it showed "political maturity" among Russians.
    The outcome was not surprising. With the country strongly behind Putin -- whose approval ratings stand around 80 percent -- and the opposition effectively sidelined, the vote had been described by some observers as the “dullest” election in Russian history. The only surprise was the scale of United Russia's win, overcoming polls suggesting it would have a poor showing.
    That was in stark contrast to the last time Russians voted for their parliament in 2011, when significant vote-rigging prompted huge street protests. Tens of thousands marched in Moscow demanding Putin’s resignation in what was the biggest popular challenge to his rule that the Russian leader has faced.
    Such upheavals seem now all but impossible, underlining the vivid shift in Russia’s political atmosphere since then.
    Many Russians said they can’t remember a more lackluster election run. Even the Kremlin official tasked with managing the vote, Vladimir Volodin, has described United Russia’s campaign as “sterile”.
    Read More . . . .



    The U.S. isn't much better than Russia
    h
    Our American "elections" are largely a joke. Unless a candidate takes millions and millions of dollars from Wall Street special interest groups he hasn't a change in Hell of getting elected to Congress. Our Congressmen represent Oligarch special interest groups, not the people.
    .
    Because of corrupt campaign money and super, mega sized districts the Wall Street funded GOP and Democrats "magically" win 100% of all elections to Congress. If 100% is not rigged elections then I don't know what is.
    .
    In the early American Republic multi-party elections were common. Today only those candidates willing to be bought and paid for are allowed to enter the halls of Congress. To say the U.S. needs election reform is an understatement.