NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams
Fascist "liberal" and "conservative" state attorney generals have banded together to limit your right to listen to news, movies - - - oh Hell, limit even watching cat videos.
The liars say this is to protect the children. But to even log on to the internet you will have to enter your ID to prove you are not a child.
The all-powerful State decides what you can watch and for how long.
Big Brother is Watching You
“War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”
1984 is Here kk "Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire."
I have been swatted twice now. Swatting is when people weaponize the police by making a false report. This endangers the target, the law-enforcement agency, and the community at whole. Swatting is a felony charge both on the state and federal level.
We have insane Marxist Democrats on the Left and equally insane Fascist Republicans on the right. Both sides want to introduce a 1984 Police State to "protect" the children.
(Infowars) A new proposal from Michigan Republicans is drawing alarm over its intent to criminalize vast portions of online speech, ban common privacy tools, and restrict depictions of transgender individuals in almost all public-facing content.
House Bill 4938, titled the “Anticorruption of Public Morals Act,” was introduced on September 11 and has been sent to the House Judiciary Committee for review.
Filed by Rep. Josh Schriver of Oxford and co-sponsored by five other Republican lawmakers, the bill lays out one of the most expansive attempts at state-level internet censorship in the country.
It demands that internet providers and platforms adopt round-the-clock surveillance systems, block the sale and use of VPNs, and prohibit a wide range of content that includes erotic AI material, sensual ASMR audio, pornographic manga, and anything representing transgenderism.
He framed the bill as necessary to protect children and claimed that current obscenity laws are outdated and rarely enforced.
The bill’s language defines “prohibited material” in broad terms. It covers depictions of sexual acts whether real or fictional, written or visual, and includes specific bans on “moaning or sensual voice content” as well as “erotic autonomous sensory meridian response content.”
It also criminalizes any portrayal of a transgender individual unless the context is strictly medical, instructional, or academic and peer-reviewed.
Under the bill, an individual or organization that distributes such material to anyone in the state could face up to 20 years in prison and a $100,000 fine. That increases to 25 years and $125,000 if over 100 instances of prohibited material are involved.
The legislation also demands that all websites, platforms, and ISPs operating in Michigan implement 24/7 automated surveillance and censorship systems to detect and remove flagged content immediately.
Companies would be forced to revise their terms of service to explicitly ban the covered content and comply with real-time enforcement protocols.
One of the most invasive aspects of the bill is its attack on VPN usage.
House Bill 4938 would make it illegal to sell or use virtual private networks within Michigan and would require internet providers to block any VPN activity.
Fines for violations related to VPN use could reach $500,000.
VPNs are commonly used to secure online activity, prevent data collection, and protect users on public Wi-Fi. Criminalizing this technology would have widespread consequences for both individuals and businesses..
Schriver publicly stated, “Don’t make it, don’t share it, don’t view it,” and called for porn distributors to be added to the sex offender registry.
Using "Think of the children" as the excuse, idiot Texas Republicans require ID to use the internet.
This ID would have to be presented when you log on to the net to make sure you are the government approved person you say you are.
Texas has moved to the forefront of a national campaign to regulate children’s access to digital platforms by mandating that Apple and Google verify the ages of all users on their app stores.
Under a new law signed by Governor Greg Abbott, set to take effect January 1, 2026, those under 18 will be required to obtain parental consent before downloading apps or making in-app purchases. The measure has been pitched as a way to protect minors, but privacy advocates warn it could come at the expense of everyone’s digital freedom.
The requirement places app store operators in the role of gatekeepers, forcing them to gather and store sensitive personal information to determine user ages.
Opponents argue that such age checks do not just affect young users, (explicit adult content apps are already banned from app stores) and they also undermine anonymity online by tying a person’s digital presence to a verified real-world identity.
That level of surveillance risks chilling free expression and stifling dissent by making it harder for people to speak or access information without fear of being identified.
Efforts to regulate youth access to apps and online services are gaining traction elsewhere as well. Utah enacted a similar policy earlier this year, and Congress is weighing federal legislation. Texas lawmakers are also advancing a separate bill that would prohibit users under 18 from accessing social media altogether.
Grace Charis is an American model, social media influencer, and content creator, born on November 21, 2002, in Newport Beach, California. She is known for her engaging content on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where she shares a mix of golf, modeling, and lifestyle posts.
Grace has gained significant popularity, amassing millions of followers across her social media accounts. Additionally, she runs a YouTube channel where she shares golf-related videos and personal insights.
She has 3.7 million Instagram followers and 280 million views on YouTube.
Grace Charis Q&A: Responding to Your Instagram Questions!
A pretty, funny young girl working in a mattress factory gets a break for fame and perhaps fortune. Then we see assholes lining up around the block to crap on her and drag her down. So sad.
Haliey Welch (born 2002 or 2003) is an American Internet personality.
She became an internet meme after being interviewed for a viral 2024 TikTok video in which she used a catchphrase, hawk tuah, an onomatopoeia for spitting as a form of oral sex, specifically fellatio.
She is also known for her podcast Talk Tuah and a cryptocurrency coin which faced criticism following release.
Welch is from Belfast, Tennessee, and worked in a bedspring factory prior to internet fame. As of 2024, she lives with her grandmother in Nashville, Tennessee.
"The first week of it, I was so embarrassed," Welch said. "I wouldn't come out of my house. I went to work, but that's about it. Other than that, I didn't go anywhere. But I went from being embarrassed to living in the moment."
Using China as the excuse, both parties joined together to give the President the power to ban internet platforms without a trial.
The Supreme Court on Friday unanimously upheld a sweeping law that not only bans TikTok but gives the President the power to ban any popular social media app deemed to be controlled by a "foreign adversary."
The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a new law that would lead to a ban of the social media platform TikTok, clearing the way for the widely popular app to shutter in the U.S. as soon as Sunday.
"We conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate the petitioners' First Amendment rights," the court said in a unanimous unsigned opinion, which upholds the lower court decision against TikTok. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch wrote separately, with Gorsuch agreeing with the outcome of the case but splitting with the court's reasoning.
The court's ruling comes days before the law, which was passed with bipartisan majorities of Congress last April, is set to take effect. TikTok and a group of content creators who use the app argued the law infringes on their free speech rights, and the Supreme Court heard arguments in their bid to block it one week ago.
"There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok's data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary," the court's opinion said.
