"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Friday, May 31, 2019

Friday Femmes with Firearms

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Censorship Alarm Sounded by Gateway Pundit Founder

Must See Video
The growing American Police State

The globalists continue to smear patriots while lobbying to ban conservatives and Trump supporters.
Founder of The Gateway Pundit Jim Hoft joins Robert Barnes and Alex to discuss the effects of Big Tech censorship and the future of free speech.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

FREE health care for illegal aliens passed by Democrats

Drop Your Pants And Bend Over
Spread your butt cheeks wide and prepare for an injection of pure Communism

EDITOR - The open borders Marxist Democrats have made it official. Every illegal alien from any nation in the world gets unlimited taxpayer funded healthcare - - - - and the moron Sheeple voters just hand over their wallets to the Democrats and then vote to re-elect them. The nation is doomed.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- (AP) -- The California Assembly voted Tuesday to extend the state's Medicaid program to eligible adults who are in the country illegally.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to spend about $98 million a year to cover low-income immigrants between the ages of 19 and 25 who are living in the country illegally. The state Senate's budget proposal would also add coverage for people 65 and older living in the country illegally.

The state Assembly's bill would cover all immigrants in California living in the country illegally over the age of 19.

But Newsom has raised concern about the assembly's bill because it is estimated to cost more than $3 billion a year.

Vote: AB 4 Arambula Assembly Third Reading

Not Voting1293

Read More . . . .

Late-Term Abortions are a ‘Right’ say Democrats

(Free Beacon)  -  Illinois Democrats are attempting to make it the most liberal state in America for abortion, declaring it a right and repealing nearly every limit on the practice.
On Tuesday evening, the Illinois House approved a measure to do away with nearly every abortion limit. The bill will loosen clinic inspection and safety standards, guarantee abortion until birth, and declare abortion a "fundamental right." House Democrats inserted it into a Senate bill during Memorial Day weekend, rushing the bill through a Sunday committee hearing. The amendment was introduced by Democratic state representative Kelly Cassidy, who had seen a standalone bill stall in committee. She did not respond to request for comment.
Cassidy defended the bill as a response to pro-life legislation passed in Georgia, Alabama, and Missouri. Rep. Avery Bourne, a Republican, took to the Illinois House floor prior to the vote to argue against the bill.
"This bill is not about keeping abortion legal in Illinois," Bourne, who is pregnant, said. "This is about a massive expansion that will impact viable babies. And that is wrong."
The bill would give Illinois the most liberal abortion regime in the country. Peter Breen, a former Illinois state representative and vice president at the non-profit Thomas More Society, said it would make the Land of Lincoln the "abortion capital" of America. He said it would exploit "vulnerable women and girls," as well as toss out widely popular compromises. The bill could undermine the state parental notification law and a state ban on partial birth abortion—a practice in which a full-term baby is delivered feet-first while the head is purposely kept inside the mother so abortionists can suck the brain out. Polling has found more than 70 percent of Americans, including majorities of Democrats, approve of such bans. The federal partial birth abortion ban will remain in effect.

"These legislators have rejected the deep convictions of a strong majority of Illinoisans and voted to legalize late-term abortions without limit … This bill expressly strips all rights from unborn children and wipes nearly every abortion regulation off the books in Illinois," Breen said in a statement. "The legacy of any legislator who voted for this bill is a cruel dehumanization on a mass scale."
The Illinois House approved the bill by a 64-50 vote. Opposition to it drew bipartisan support with six Democrats voting no and four voting present. There is little Republicans can do to prevent the bill from becoming law as Democrats have a supermajority. Gov. J.B. Pritzker praised his party-mates for passing the bill.
"We must do everything in our power to protect women's rights in Illinois," he said in a statement following the vote.
Pro-life activists in the state and nationwide criticize the bill as "radical" and "extremist." Illinois Right to Life mustered fierce opposition to the bill, including a rally against late-term abortion that organizers said attracted 4,000 people.

"No words can express the disappointment and heartache pro-life Illinoisans, like myself, are feeling," Illinois Right to Life Action legislative chairman Ralph Rivera said in a release. "The incredible grassroots efforts of Illinois citizens who worked against this bill was astounding and makes it clear that we were in the majority."
Mary Kate Knorr of Illinois Right to Life Action accused the Democrats behind the bill of sacrificing their constituents for campaign donations. She pointed to Personal PAC, a pro-abortion group that dedicated about $2 million to outside spending over the last two years, in addition to contributing nearly $350,000 to candidates, according to the National Institute on Money in Politics. "They knew exactly what the people of the state wanted, but they sided with the promise of Personal PAC's campaign money in the upcoming election," Knorr said.
National pro-life leaders also condemned the bill. Jill Stanek, an Illinois resident who serves as national campaign chair of the Susan B. Anthony List, said the legislation would make "Illinois a killing field." She said the bill threatens not only babies, but women seeking abortion and doctors or employers who object to the process. She questioned how pro-abortion advocates that argue that banning the practice would only lead to unregulated "back-alley abortions" could support legislation that lifts safety inspections.
"It allows abortions by a non-doctor, in a clinic that's not inspected and doesn't have to report injuries," she said in an email. "It allows self-abortions and forces all health insurance policies to cover abortions, including religious organizations."
Pro-life groups said that its passage should galvanize further activism. Knorr of Illinois Right to Life Action said the only way to rein in the movement for limitless abortion is to hold supporters accountable in the 2020 election.
"It is time for the pro-life people of Illinois to stand up," she said. "Legislators may have pretended not to hear when your voices echoed throughout the Capitol in March, but your vote in 2020 will send a message they can't ignore."
The bill will now be sent to the Democrat-controlled Senate to approve the amended language. If it passes, it will then be sent to Gov. Pritzker.
Read More . . . .

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

If Only We Had Free Elections in America

American "Democracy" is Near Death 

American candidates of both parties no longer represent local voters. They are bought and paid for by Billionaire Cartels of open borders Wall Street interests.

Our elections are a sham.  Because of the
 massive size of districts only candidates who are millionaires or those funded by Billionaire Cartels have any chance of being elected.

And those wealthy special interests want to be paid back out of the US Treasury.
The U.S. is the only nation on earth where the same two corrupt parties "magically" win 100% of all elections.

Until our election system is reformed to allow for real competition and real voter choices, Americans are doomed to be ruled by a bought and paid for Elite.

This is what a FREE election looks like

I love that the corrupt open borders and authoritarian Conservative Party came in 5th place while a brand new party of patriot Nationalists comes in 1st winning 29 seats.

Results of the 2019 European Parliament election in the United Kingdom
Brexit PartyEFDD5,248,53330.52new party29new party
Liberal DemocratsALDE3,367,28419.5816Increase15
Labour PartyS&D2,347,25513.6510Decrease10
Green Party of England and WalesG/EFA2,023,38011.767Increase4
Conservative PartyECR1,512,1478.794Decrease15
Scottish National PartyG/EFA594,5533.463Increase1
Plaid CymruG/EFA163,9280.951Steady
Sinn FéinGUE/NGL126,9510.741Steady
Alliance Party of Northern IrelandALDE105,9280.621Increase1
Change UKEPP[party 1]571,8463.32new party0new party
UK Independence PartyEAPN[party 2]554,4633.220Decrease24
Traditional Unionist VoiceNI62,0210.360Steady
Ulster Unionist PartyECR53,0520.310Decrease1
Yorkshire PartyG/EFA50,8420.300Steady
English DemocratsN/A39,9380.23Decrease0.60Steady
UK European Union PartyN/A33,5760.20new party0new party
Animal Welfare PartyN/A25,2320.150Steady
Women's Equality PartyN/A23,7660.14new party0new party
Independent NetworkN/A7,6410.040
Socialist Party of Great BritainN/A3,5050.020
Valid Votes17,199,701

Results of the election by seats, with constituencies shaded by the highest polling party.

(2019 European Parliament election)

From Sargon of Akkad
UKIP Candidate for Parliament

A 19th Century Political Stump Speech
Unlike today, true democracy existed in 19th Century America.  Because the size of House districts was small the main expense a candidate had was to open a few kegs of beer, jump on the nearest tree stump and explain his positions to voters who may or may not have been sober.  It is the opinion of many that a candidate sounds better with every additional beer.
In the early Republic House districts had about 30,000 people.  Voters could easily meet their candidate without millions in corrupt special interest money being spent.

Reform Our Elections

"THE SECOND charge against the House of Representatives is, that it will be too small to possess a due knowledge of the interests of its constituents. . . . The House of Representatives as above explained it seems to give the fullest assurance, that a representative for every THIRTY THOUSAND INHABITANTS will render the latter both a safe and competent guardian of the interests which will be confided to it."

- - - - The Federalist Papers #56

Trans Boys Can Shower With Girls Says Supreme Court

What the Fuck????

  • I am so fucking sick and tired of the worthless pieces of crap who call themselves "Conservatives".
  • The "Conservatives" on the Supreme Court had a chance to bring a bit of sanity back to society and fight creeping Transgenderism - - - but as usual the "Conservatives" ran from the issues.

(WND)  -  The U.S. Supreme Court decided Tuesday not to take a case against a Pennsylvania school district that secretly implemented a program allowing boys into the girls’ shower rooms.
The fight erupted when officials in the Boyertown Area School District in Pennsylvania allowed a boy who says he’s a girl to use the rest rooms and showers for girls based on his “gender identity.”
However, the district officials refused to let other students or their parents know that their privacy rights were being violated. Students who were were exposed to members of the opposite sex protested and eventually sued.
School officials told those protesting the change to get used to it.
The Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented the students, confirmed on Tuesday the court declined to take up the case.
The decision leaves standing a lower court ruling that the “Pennsylvania school district [can disregard] its students’ bodily privacy rights.”
“The Boyertown Area School District secretly implemented the policy during the 2016-17 school year,” ADF said. “Some male students learned about it only because they were undressing in their locker room and discovered that a female student was changing clothes with them. Embarrassed and confused, the students sought help from school officials, who told them they should just ‘tolerate it’ and ‘make it as natural as possible.’ One of those male students left the school entirely as a result.”
ADF Senior Counsel John Bursch said students “struggling with their beliefs about gender need compassionate support, but sound reasons based on common sense have always existed for schools to separate male and female teenagers in showers, restrooms, and locker rooms.”
“No student’s recognized right to bodily privacy should be made contingent on what other students believe about their own gender,” he said. “Because the 3rd Circuit’s decision made a mess of bodily privacy and Title IX principles, we believe the Supreme Court should have reviewed it. But we hope the court will take up a similar case in the future to bring much needed clarity to how the lower courts should handle violations of well-established student privacy rights.”
ADF explained the litigation is the result of the Obama administration’s “unilateral and extraordinary decision in 2016 to issue a written edict to public schools which, by fiat, interpreted Title IX’s sex discrimination provisions (‘no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity’) to require public schools to allow students to access bathrooms and locker rooms based on ‘an individual’s internal sense of gender.’
“As a result, transgenderism, also known as gender dysphoria, was read into a statute written solely to address sex, not gender identity. As a result, bathroom and locker room access in many public schools, including in the Boyertown Area School District, became based on subjective feelings, not objective facts or biology,” ADF explained.
Read More . . . .

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Happy Memorial Day

Least We Forget
Always honor the soldier, but always question 
the sanity of the leaders.

Memorial Day is a federal holiday in the United States for remembering the people who died while serving in the country's armed forces. The holiday, which is observed every year on the last Monday of May, originated as Decoration Day after the American Civil War in 1868, when the Grand Army of the Republic, an organization of Union veterans — established it as a time for the nation to decorate the graves of the war dead with flowers. 

By the 20th century, competing Union and Confederate holiday traditions, celebrated on different days, had merged, and Memorial Day eventually extended to honor all Americans who died while in the military service.

The first widely-publicized observance of a Memorial Day-type observance after the Civil War was in Charleston, South Carolina, on May 1, 1865.

Copying an idea that began in the Southern states, on May 5, 1868, in his capacity as commander-in-chief of the Grand Army of the Republic, the veterans' organization for Union Civil War veterans, General John A. Logan issued a proclamation calling for "Decoration Day" to be observed annually and nationwide.

Memorial events were held in 183 cemeteries in 27 states in 1868, and 336 in 1869. The northern states quickly adopted the holiday. 

General John Logan
General Logan proclaimed the first "Decoration Day" to honor the fallen soldiers of the American Civil War.  He served the state of Illinois as a State Senator, a Congressman, a U.S. Senator and was an unsuccessful candidate for Vice President of the United States with James G. Blaine in the election of 1884. 

Ballad of the Green Mountain Boys
We owe no allegiance, we bow to no throne,
Our ruler is law and the law is our own;
Our leaders themselves are our own fellow-men,
Who can handle the sword and the scythe and the pen
Hurrah for Vermont! For the land that we till
Must have sons to defend her from valley and hill
Our vow is recorded--our banner unfurled,
In the name of Vermont we defy all the world!
Then cheer, cheer, the green mountaineer, then cheer, cheer the green mountaineer

The Star Spangled Banner at Fort McHenry

Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved home and the war's desolation!
Blest with victory and peace, may the heav'n rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

- - - The Star Spangled Banner (1814)

Mexican-American War

We'll Fight for Uncle Sam

"The Girl I left behind Me"

1st Nebraska Volunteer Infantry
The First Nebraska Volunteer Infantry was mustered into service on May 9 and 10, 1898 at Lincoln, Nebraska. At the time of muster-in, the unit consisted of fifty-one officers and 983 enlisted men.
On May 16, the regiment left Lincoln for San Francisco, where it arrived three days later. The 1st Nebraska was assigned to the Third Independent Brigade of the Philippine Expeditionary Force.


"I have seen that we do not intend to free, but to subjugate the people of the Philippines. We have gone there to conquer, not to redeem."
Mark Twain
(New York Herald - 10/15/1900)

20th Kansas Volunteers lining up for dinner at San Fernando, Philippines. 
PHOTO was taken in May 1899.

Filipino American War.com

Lafayettewe are here!”

Over There: Remembering WWI
Music by George M. Cohan, Sung by Billy Murray


United States Marines in Helmand Province, Afghanistan

“When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not Guilty'.” 
― Theodore Roosevelt