"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Indiana Bill Takes on “Policing for Profit”

What Does Crime Have to do With it?

  • There is along hard fight at the state level to protect our private property from being stolen without a trial and the cash given to the police.
  • Special Note  -  The "small government" GOP in Congress is all in favor of taking your home, car or personal effects without a trial.That is reason #38 why I left the authoritarian Republican Party.

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (Tenth Amendment Center) – A bill filed in the Indiana Senate would reform the state’s asset forfeiture laws to prohibit the state from taking property without a criminal conviction. The legislation also takes on federal forfeiture programs by banning prosecutors from circumventing state laws by passing cases off to the feds.
Sen. Phil Boots (R-Crawfordsville) introduced Senate Bill 8 (SB8) on Jan. 3. The legislation would reform Indiana law by requiring a criminal conviction before prosecutors could proceed with asset forfeiture. Under current law, the state can seize assets even if a person is never found guilty of a crime, or even arrested.

SB8 also closes a loophole that allows prosecutors to bypass more stringent state asset forfeiture laws by passing cases off to the federal government under its Equitable Sharing forfeiture program. 
The proposed law would repeal Section 9 IC34-24-1-9 permitting the state to turn over seized property to the federal government.
Barring state and local law enforcement agencies from passing off cases to the feds is particularly important. In several states with strict asset forfeiture laws, prosecutors have done just that. 
By placing the case under federal jurisdiction, law enforcement can bypass the need for a conviction under state law and collect up to 80 percent of the proceeds from forfeited assets via the federal Equitable Sharing Program.
For example, California previously had some of the strongest state-level restrictions on civil asset forfeiture in the country, but law enforcement would often bypass the state restrictions by partnering with a federal asset forfeiture program known as “equitable sharing.” 
Under these arrangements, state officials would simply hand over forfeiture prosecutions to the federal government and then receive up to 80 percent of the proceeds—even when state law banned or limited the practice. 
According to a report by the Institute for Justice, Policing for Profit, California ranked dead last of all states in the country between 2000 and 2013 as the worst offender. 
During the 2016 legislative session, the state closed the loophole.
As the Tenth Amendment Center previously reported the federal government inserted itself into the asset forfeiture debate in California. The feds clearly want the policy to continue.
Read More . . . .

You Say Robbery, 
Cops Say Civil Asset Forfeiture

States Take on Federal Forfeiture Program

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

despotic officials theft and plunder , on a self made injust law ...
thats something as we know from "feudal europe" , thats why english made the Magna Carta , and the Glorious Revolution ... or you your revolution
you go backwards in it with this so call "Grand Theft Robery from Indianápolis"