(Infowars) A controversial process called “alkaline hydrolysis,” where the bodies of dead people are liquified using a mixture of water, heat, and chemical agents, is being approved for use in states across America.
The latest state to contemplate using the body disposal method is Wisconsin, which just approved Senate Bill 228 that authorizes the practice.
The Republican-led Senate of Wisconsin passed the bill, which states, “A person may use the process of alkaline hydrolysis to cremate human remains only if the person is registered as a crematory authority by the Department of Safety and Professional Services. The bill places the use of alkaline hydrolysis for cremating human remains under generally the same requirements that apply under current law to conventional cremation.”
In 1993, the EPA passed “Rule 503” which allows “the spreading, spraying, injection, or incorporation of sewage sludge” to lands, including, “public parks, ball fields, cemeteries, plant nurseries, and golf courses.”
The EPA allows “biosolids” to be used in playgrounds and farms despite the fact that it contains high concentrations of heavy metals, neurotoxic chemicals and toxins the agency classifies as “primary pollutants.”
While the government promotes spraying dead bodies and sewage on crops and parks as “green” recycling combatting climate change, others are sounding the alarm about potential dangers.
The harmful effects of biosolids have been well documented across the U.S., including North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Maine, Michigan and several other states.
Nevertheless, eighteen states have already legalized alkaline hydrolysis.
In the UK, a public crematorium was the first to receive permission to begin using alkaline hydrolysis, but in March 2017 local water utility Severn Trent Water refused the council’s application for a “trade effluent permit” because there was no water industry standard regulating the disposal of liquified human remains into sewers.
“It is the liquefied remains of the dead going into the water system. We don’t think the public will like the idea,” a UK Water source explained.
No comments:
Post a Comment