.

NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT

"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Monday, June 2, 2014

Cop may retire with $30,000 a month pension


 
It's Taxpayer Rape
  • An ex-California sheriff says his $276,000 pension is not enough.  He has gone to court to demand an increase in his pension to over $360,000 or $30,000 a month
  • California has 20,000 employees with pensions in excess of $100,000.


"Corruptus in Extremis"  -  Efforts to overhaul California's public pension system are getting a boost as taxpayers voice outrage over a former sheriff who asked a court for $75,000 more a year in retirement pay -- on top of his current annual pension of $276,000.

The latest battle in Ventura County is being fueled by the case of former Sheriff Robert Brooks. He retired in 2011 with a salary of $227,000. Today, he collects $50,000 a year more than that, with guaranteed cost-of-living increases. But that wasn't enough. Now he's suing for $75,000 more, claiming it’s allowed under the law.

 
But voters may have the final say going forward. Ventura County voters will consider an initiative in November, similar to a possible statewide measure, that would funnel all new employees into a 401k savings plan rather than a pension.

It would also, like an initiative passed in San Jose, give current employees a choice -- either increase their contributions or cut future benefits reports Fox News.

"People are so excited that finally somebody is going to do something about this problem," said Jim McDermott, of Ventura County Taxpayers Association. "I'm pretty confident that we are going to follow in the success that we've seen in San Diego and San Jose. We're going to be successful without question."
Ex-Sheriff Robert Brooks
Wants $30,000 a month pension.

Unions, as might be expected, oppose the measures.

An analysis by the Los Angeles Times found 84 percent of the roughly two-dozen Ventura County retirees with pensions in excess of $100,000 made more money in retirement than working.

When chief county executive Marty Robinson left in 2011 making $228,000, his annual pension totaled $272,000.

Their packages are emblematic of what critics consider a runaway pension problem.

The chief executive of Solano County retired with a $371,000 pension. A police chief in Stockton left with a $204,000 annual pension after just eight months on the job.

An Orange County attorney retired with a pension of $226,000 -- $14,000 more than his final salary. He also got a check for $352,097 for nearly 2,500 hours of unused sick and vacation time.

In California, 20,000 employees have pensions in excess of $100,000.

UPDATE  -  The Ventura County Star newspaper now places ex-Sheriff Robert Brooks' total pension package at over $360,000 a year.

(Ventura County Star)



_________________________________


Former Merced County Sheriff Mark Pazin

The $17,000 a Month Man
  • So-called "public servants" are collecting far, far more in retirement than most of the taxpayers earn while working for a living.


Former Merced County Sheriff Mark Pazin will receive more money during his retirement than he did while employed, according to the details of his pension package.

Pazin, who retired in December to accept a job with Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration, will be eligible for a state retirement package after five years of service in Sacramento. Pazin was appointed to head the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Law Enforcement Branch.

Pazin’s annual pension from Merced County is $199,577.52, according to information obtained through a public records request. Put another way, Pazin will receive $16,631.46 each month reports the Sacramento Bee.

During his final year as sheriff, Pazin’s annual salary was $163,092.80, said county spokesman Mike North.

Pazin served 33.25 years under the county, according to records from the county’s retirement association. Vacation and sick hours were included in the 57-year-old’s pension.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/02/17/6166141/details-of-pazins-retirement-released.html#storylink=cpy

If Pazin retires from the state, he would receive 12.5 percent of his annual salary, which is $120,000 per year. Assuming Pazin received no raises during his tenure, his state retirement checks would be about $15,000 a year, or $1,250 each month.

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/02/17/6166141/details-of-pazins-retirement-released.html#storylink=cpy

One expert said it’s not uncommon for law enforcement officials to accept another job after retirement and collect two pensions, but some residents might feel it’s at the expense of taxpayers.

“Most of us don’t see these types of numbers in our pensions,” said Thomas Holyoke, an associate professor in the department of political science at California State University, Fresno. “This is the sort of thing that gets a lot of people around the state upset, especially when the state is complaining about being broke.”

Holyoke said most people understand the amount of risk and responsibility involved with being a sheriff, but seeing the large retirement packages of elected officials can frustrate those that are struggling to survive.

“It’s hard to justify politically when people see these huge payouts,” Holyoke said. “Most people work in the private sector for hourly wages and don’t have retirement benefits anywhere like this.
.
“Most people have to work beyond the age of 62 just to be able to survive,” he said.

Efforts were made to reach Pazin, but he could not be reached for comment.



No comments: