$2,000 reward to report neighbors guilty of “wrongspeak”

 

(Natural News)  The Washington state legislature has passed a bill to create a statewide snitching infrastructure for residents to report their neighbors for "wrongspeak."

Senate Bill 5427, which passed both the Senate and the House and now awaits Gov. Jay Inslee's signature, allows private individuals, including non-citizens and illegal aliens, to reports "bias incidents" to the state attorney general's office. Each reporting incident comes with a potential reward payout of $2,000.

The bill's supporters say its purpose is to protect "victims of hate crimes" before said crimes even occur, but at what cost? In essence, SB 5427 creates a tattletale hotline designed to intimidate people in Washington from speaking their minds, especially when such speech might be politically incorrect.

From what we can tell, SB 5427 is unconstitutional for at least the following five reasons:

1) It infringes on one's right to confront his accuser

2) It impedes freedom of speech

3) It violates freedom of thought, an implied right in the First Amendment

4) It steamrolls freedom of religion

5) It impairs freedom of the press

"People will stop talking to others and writing to others except very close friends and relatives for fear a greedy 'Karen' will report them to Washington's version of the Gestapo," is how one independent media outlet framed SB 5427.

NaturalNews.com

1984 is Here

"Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." 
 

 - - - Robert A. Heinlein

A Brief History of Criminal FBI Entrapment Operations

Fight for Freedom

Abolish the FBI, CIA, NSA & ATF

FBI hides evidence on Kyle Rittenhouse shooting

Abolish the FBI, CIA and NSA

The FBI has been a corrupt shit stain on America's underwear from day one.

The morons in the FBI made their name by creating a Police State where a man could not even drink a beer. The last few years we saw the FBI, CIA and NSA join to overthrow the government of President Trump.

Abolish all the agencies.

Follow The Salty Cracker on the free speech video platform Bitchute.com

GOP Gov. Refuses to sign law banning warrantless spying

This graphic illustrates how a StingRay works. Signals from cellphones within the device's radius are bounced to law enforcement. The information relayed may include names, phone numbers, locations, call records and even text messages. 

GOP Governor Refuses 

to Back Bill of Rights

• The Fascist GOP Governor of Maryland, who has the entire state under Coronavirus House Arrest, has refused to sign a law protecting our 4th Amendment right to privacy.
• In Maryland both parties passed the bill to protect our rights while in Washington both parties protect and fund all programs to rape our rights.

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (May 8, 2020) – Yesterday, Maryland GOP Gov. Lawrence Hogan announced he would allow a bill to ban the use of “stingrays” to track the location of phones without a warrant and prohibit police from sweeping up electronic communications to go into law without his signature.

Del. David Moon (D), along with three fellow Democrats, introduced House Bill 499 (HB499) on Jan. 24. Sen. Charles Sydnor (D-Baltimore) sponsored the companion, Senate Bill 246 (SB246). The new law helps block the use of cell-site simulators, known as “stingrays.” 

These devices essentially spoof cell phone towers, tricking any device within range into connecting to the stingray instead of the tower. This allows law enforcement to sweep up communications content, as well as locate and track the person in possession of a specific phone or other electronic device.

The new law adds provisions to existing Maryland statutes limiting warrantless location tracking through electronic devices to address the use of cell-site simulators. Under the law, police will be required to get a court order based on probable cause before deploying a stingray device. The law also bars police from using a stingray to obtain communication content and spells out explicit criteria law enforcement must meet in order to justify such an order.

On Feb. 27, the House passed HB499 by a 132-4 vote. The Senate concurred with a unanimous vote of 45-0. The law will go into effect on Oct. 1, 2020.

The new law includes limitations on the use of stingrays even with a court order. These restrictions require police to restrict the investigative use of any third–party or non-target data without a further court order. The law requires the deletion of any incidentally gathered information on persons not named in the court order immediately upon the expiration of the order.

Information gathered in violation of the law will be subject to the exclusionary rule as judicially determined. Information gathered on non-targeted devices would not be admissible in court under any circumstances.

The law will not only protect privacy in Maryland, but it will also hinder one aspect of the federal surveillance state.

The federal government funds the vast majority of state and local stingray programs, attaching one important condition. The feds require agencies acquiring the technology to sign non-disclosure agreements. This throws a giant shroud over the program, even preventing judges, prosecutors and defense attorneys from getting information about the use of stingrays in court. 

The feds actually instruct prosecutors to withdraw evidence if judges or legislators press for information. As the Baltimore Sun reported in April 2015, a Baltimore detective refused to answer questions on the stand during a trial, citing a federal non-disclosure agreement.

The feds sell the technology in the name of “anti-terrorism” efforts. With non-disclosure agreements in place, most police departments refuse to release any information on the use of stingrays. But information obtained from the Tacoma Police Department revealed that it uses the technology primarily for routine criminal investigations.

Some privacy advocates argue that stingray use can never happen within the parameters of the Fourth Amendment because the technology necessarily connects to every electronic device within range, not just the one held by the target. And the information collected by these devices undoubtedly ends up in federal databases.

The feds can share and tap into vast amounts of information gathered at the state and local level through fusion centers and a system known as the “information sharing environment” or ISE. In other words, stingrays create the potential for the federal government to track the movement of millions of Americans with no warrant, no probable cause, and without the people even knowing it.

The federal government funds the vast majority of state and local stingray programs, attaching one important condition. The feds require agencies acquiring the technology to sign non-disclosure agreements. 

This throws a giant shroud over the program, even preventing judges, prosecutors and defense attorneys from getting information about the use of stingrays in court. 

The feds actually instruct prosecutors to withdraw evidence if judges or legislators press for information. As the Baltimore Sun reported in April 2015, a Baltimore detective refused to answer questions on the stand during a trial, citing a federal non-disclosure agreement.

TenthAmendmentCenter.com

George Orwell - A Final Warning

1984 - Police Helicopter Tracks Down Campers

Now Camping is Against The Law

(Summit News)  -  Police in Tasmania are using a surveillance helicopter to track down people camping in remote locations in violation of coronavirus lockdown laws.

“Tasmania Police officers conducting aerial surveillance around the state, including on the North-West Coast located several campsites where people were directed to leave and return home,” reports The Advocate.

“When u social distance so well that the cops have to find u by helicopter,” tweeted Twitter user @PetiteNicoco.

17 people across the state were charged with a lockdown offense in a period of just 24 hours over the Easter weekend.

The Westpac Rescue Helicopter “landed near campsites which were viewed from the air” to interrogate campers in the region. Where the chopper couldn’t land, officers were dispatched to the area on foot.

Commander Rob Blackwood called the campers “selfish” for endangering other people during the COVID-19 pandemic despite them literally being around no other people.

“Covert and marked police vehicles, and the Westpac Rescue Helicopter, will continue to undertake patrols around the state, so if you’re away from your primary residence you can expect police to stop and speak to you about your movements,” Tasmania Police said on their Facebook page.

The practice was denounced by many as absurd overkill given that the campers are hardly posing a threat to anybody.

“That seems like a waste of resources,” responded one Twitter user.

“You will do as commanded, even if you’re already doing it in the woods. Compliance is nonoptional. The state knows what is best, citizen,” commented another.

Summit.news

The WHO's Bungled Covid Response | Louder with Crowder

The Death of America, Part XVIII

The Swamp Controls All

Nothing will stop the Death of America

By Gary;

Talk about a giant Clusterfuck.

William Barr, President Trump's pick for Attorney General, is yet another swamp creature from the Bush 41 era.

The problem is Trump has been picking Republicans to fill posts instead of Nationalists. I can't blame Trump too much. The bench of Nationalists is thin so he is often stuck with "Conservative" Republicans.

The do-nothing Republican Party in Congress is not only corrupt beyond words, but has the spine of a jelly fish. It refuses to address almost any issue that really matters and the Elites are "best friends" with each other.  Dems and Republicans work together to keep the party going and the cash flowing.

A good example is this latest AP article.

Senator Lindsey Graham (R) said:

Barr has a “high opinion” of Mueller. Barr and Mueller worked together when Barr was Bush’s attorney general from 1991 to 1993 and Mueller oversaw the department’s criminal division. Graham said that the two men were “best friends,” that their wives attended Bible study together and that Mueller had attended the weddings of Barr’s children.

“So his opinion of Mr. Mueller is very, very high in terms of ethics and character and professionalism,” Graham said.

“I asked Mr. Barr directly, ‘Do you think Mr. Mueller is on a witch hunt?’ He said no.

The senator said Barr also told him that he has a high opinion of Rod Rosenstein.


Bottom Line

Everyone in the bipartisan swamp is buddy, buddy with each other. Both sides see the need to keep the corrupt money and big paying jobs to friends flowing. Don't upset the apple cart by actually standing for something. Simply no significant member of the corrupt Elites ever goes to jail.

America is doomed because the Elites are too busy looting the country.

I rather admire the Democrats. They are openly Marxist and Looney Tunes Left.

It is the "Conservative" Republicans I hate because they have no interest in standing up for freedom and the Constitution.

The GOP has fully embraced open borders so their Masters on Wall Street can get their cheap labor.

The party is almost totally silent as true Conservatives are censored on the Internet. Plus the party fully funds the expansion of the FBI-NSA-CIA Police State.

Between open borders and the growing Police State that openly spies on Presidential candidates the Constitutional Republic we knew will soon be dead. That is because even "Republican" Attorney Generals never prosecute fellow Elites. No one ever goes to jail.

When Trump is gone we will see endless open borders and Marxist anarchy.

That's all folks. America is gone.


Read More . . .

"That's all America"

"We know what happens when one lies to the FBI.  But what is the punishment when the FBI lies to us?"
Matt Drudge
.
Read More:
FBI Agents Afraid To Testify, Say Congress Won’t Protect Them

Marxists Capture The Mexican Congress

Re-Name Mexico: "Venezuela North"

I held off to see the final Mexican election returns.

But with the votes in it is official:  the Marxists have captured both houses of Congress.

If the non-Marxist parties had been able to retain control of the Senate there would have been a check on a shift to radical Socialism.

If you think illegals are coming over the border now just wait until the Communist Secret Police gets established.

Senate of the Republic

The Marxists control the Senate 70 to 58

Chamber of Deputies

Chamber of Deputies

The Marxists control the lower house 312 to 188

Marxism takes hold of the Democrat Party

"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide."

Ayn Rand

WASHINGTON TIMES – CHERYL K. CHUMLEY

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a card-carrying member of the Democratic Socialists of America — a socialist — and she just won a congressional primary in New York City.

What a face slap to America.

What an affront to all the Founding Fathers forged.

Ocasio-Cortez is by socialist nature an enemy of the American way of life.

How would this woman, should she win in the general election, seriously take the oath of office? Socialism and the Constitution have nothing in common; the one cannot exist with the other.

Yes, Congress is now filled with other Democratic Socialists, either in name or in ideology. They caucus as the congressional progressives, a far-left group with around 70 members. And yes, Democrats as a party far too often these days tout what is basically a socialist style of governing; they just don’t call it that.

And yes, Bernie Sanders, a self-declared socialist who hid behind an independent label, did just run for president — and won over so many youthful converts in the process that he gave Hillary Clinton a near heart attack, figuratively speaking, that is.

They’re all enemies of America, too.

But Ocasio-Cortez actually pays dues to the DSA.

“Ocasio-Cortez [if elected] will become the only current member of Congress who is a dues-paying member of the Democratic Socialists of America,” TelesurTV.net noted.

America — real America — spits on those dues.

So how did she win this upset over her Democratic contender, Rep. Joseph Crowley?

Socialists rise through the ranks of the political world by selling promises of easy living — by basically sucking up to the lowest denominator of human kind and tossing out the victim card whenever and wherever possible. They do this for control, to grab power.

This woman, Ocasio-Cortez, wants to abolish U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. She wants to implement a federally imposed $15 per hour minimum wage. She wants to ban assault weapons — as the Democrats define assault weapons, of course. But more than all that: She wants to tear down all that this country represents, all that makes this country great, all that’s been in this nation’s DNA since its founding.

What is that DNA?

Only this — which is everything: The fact that in this country, individual rights come from God, not government. Socialists don’t recognize God as the bestower of rights and freedoms. Socialists only recognize themselves — themselves and their chosen cronies — as the granters and gifters and grand bestowers of all that’s good, all that’s fair, all that’s just.

She doesn’t say that — not in so many words.

Ocasio-Cortez presents herself as if she’s all about the little guy, all for the good of the people, all against the Big Bad Wolves of corporate control and government corruption. But you can’t be a socialist and a real American at the same time.

Read more at The Washington Times

Socialists no longer need their own party.  They have largly taken over the Democrat Party.
.
Socialists also control a lot of the "Conservative" GOP which has never voted to cut even one penny of Federal spending or abolish even one tiny insignificant government program.

Communists arrest Christians for praying

Communists Only Worship The State

(RFA)  -  Police in the southwestern Chinese province of Sichuan have detained 17 Christians after they gathered for memorial prayers for the victims of the massacre that ended the 1989 student-led protests on Beijing's Tiananmen Square.

Members of the Qiuyu, or Early Rain, Protestant church in Sichuan's provincial capital Chengdu were detained after they showed up for a prayer meeting titled "Praying for Our Country on June 4," church members told RFA.

Police from Chengdu's Caoshijie police station in Qingyang district and local officials from the religious affairs bureau burst in on the gathering in a residential building in the district at around 3 p.m. on Monday.

They ordered the prayers to end immediately on the grounds that the meeting was an "illegal assembly."

Public memorials and discussions of the events of June 1989 are banned, with activists who seek to commemorate the bloodshed often detained and veteran dissidents placed under police surveillance or detention during each anniversary.

Police detained Qiuyu pastor Wang Yi and preachers Li Yingqiang, Zhang Xudong, Ge Yingfeng and more than 10 church members, taking them down to the police station for questioning.

Photos of the scene seen by RFA showed plainclothes officers in the church office, with some people shooting video of proceedings. On the street below, uniformed officers had sealed off the street to traffic, according to social media posts made by church members.

By 8 p.m. on Monday evening, a number of church members were also placed under house arrest, according to a church member who requested anonymity.

"None of them have been released yet; they won't be released now, because today is a [politically] sensitive date," the church member said. "The church members who didn't attend had been detained in their own homes."

"Pastor Wang Yi arrived at the church at around 1 p.m., and Li Yingqiang was there waiting, having called on our brothers and sisters to arrive early," the church member said. "We never thought they would be there by 3 p.m."

Released the next day

The church members were all released the following day, Li Yingqiang told RFA on Tuesday.

"They never actually gave a real reason for detaining us," Li said. "All they would say was that it was an illegal assembly. But I think the real reason was that they didn't want that prayer meeting to go ahead, so they took [us] down to the police station."

"They were very rough and rude in the process, and they beat up a few people while they were detaining us," he said. "They slapped me around the head once they'd gotten hold of me. They split my lip."

Read More . . . .

Georgia cop fired for flying Confederate flag at her house

The Police State Attacks Police

• The Thought Police will now get you fired from your job if you dare to fly a flag on your own private property that has not been approved by Big Brother.

(AJC.com)  -  A Roswell police sergeant who was fired from her job this month for flying the Confederate battle flag in front of her house is appealing her termination and said Tuesday she had no idea the flag was controversial.

In an interview with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, former police sergeant Silvia Cotriss said she had been flying the battle flag below the American flag in front of her Woodstock house for more than a year with no complaints from neighbors or passersby.

So she was surprised the week of July 11, when detectives with the department’s internal affairs division notified her that she was being investigated for conduct unbecoming an officer on or off duty.

“If I knew it offended someone, my friends, my family, I wouldn’t do it,” Cotriss told the AJC. “Police officers have to adjust a lot of things in our lives, and for 20 years my whole life has been about making change and being held to a higher standard. We take an oath to help and protect people, so we can’t have a private life that’s really bad.”

Roswell Police Chief Rusty Grant declined Tuesday to comment on the case.

“We don’t comment on personnel issues,” Grant said. “The (personnel) file stands as it is.”

Cotriss’ case file, obtained by the AJC, outlines the case of the 53-year-old, 20-year veteran of the Roswell Police Department. Cotriss rose through the ranks in the suburban force of 200 employees. For years she received commendations for her work from civilians, peers and supervisors, for everything from helping a man with dementia get home to his wife, to helping someone whose car battery had died.

Read More . . . .

The "Evil" Flag of Haters
The Big Brother Thought Police and their controlled Media Machine indoctrinates the public that the snake flag is a symbol of evil capitalists, counter-revolutionaries and bigots.

An "Approved" Flag at the
Democrat Convention
The controlled Media Machine and the Thought Police ignored and refused to report on the Communist flags flying at the Democrat Convention.
.
The signal to the public is Communism is "normal" and approved by the state.
.
See More:
Communist flags appear at Democrat Convention 

Signed into Law: Two California Bills to Protect Privacy Against Warrantless Surveillance

California Stops Big Brother

• In California Dems and Republicans banned together to protect our liberty.
• Meanwhile at the Federal level we see both parties eagerly funding every 1984 spy program ever created.

(Tenth Amendment Center)  -  California Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law not just one, but two bills that represent some of the strongest privacy protections in the country. The new laws work together to protect privacy from some of the worst spying programs on the state level, but also take on a part of the federal surveillance state. 

Sen. Mark Leno (D) and Sen. Joel Anderson (R) introduced Senate Bill 178 (SB178), the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA_, in February. Touted as a major electronic data privacy act, the bill would prohibit government entities from “compelling the production of or access to electronic communication information or electronic device information,” and bar them from obtaining electronic device information by means of “physical interaction or electronic communication with the electronic device” without a search warrant, a wiretap order, an order for electronic reader records, or “pursuant to a subpoena issued pursuant to existing state law, provided that the information is not sought for the purpose of investigating or prosecuting a criminal offense,” with only a few exceptions.

As noted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), “CalECPA protects Californians by requiring a warrant for digital records, including emails and texts, as well as a user’s geographical location. These protections apply not only to your devices, but to online services that store your data. Only two other states have so far offered these protections: Maine and Utah.”

SB178 passed the Assembly and Senate by wide margins.

“Governor Brown just signed a law that says ‘no’ to warrantless government snooping in our digital information. This is a landmark win for digital privacy and all Californians,” Nicole Ozer, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union of California ACLU, said in a statement. “We hope this is a model for the rest of the nation in protecting our digital privacy rights.”

The legislation will also require law enforcement to obtain a warrant, wiretap order, an order for electronic reader records or a subpoena before compelling any person other than the owner of the device to produce electronic information. This specifically includes third party providers.

Passage will also help block the use of cell site simulators, known as “stingrays.” These devices essentially spoof cell phone towers, tricking any device within range into connecting to the stingray instead of the tower, allowing law enforcement to sweep up communications content, as well as locate and track the person in possession of a specific phone or other electronic device. SB178 will require a warrant, wiretap order, or an order for e-reader records before police could deploy these devices under most circumstances.

SB178 does include an exception to the warrant requirement “If the government entity, in good faith, believes that an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires access to the electronic device information.” It also allows access to information in order to locate a lost or stolen device and with the “specific consent” of the owner of the device.

Under the new law, a service provider may voluntarily disclose electronic communication information or subscriber information when that disclosure is not otherwise prohibited by state or federal law. If a government entity receives electronic communication information voluntarily provided pursuant to subdivision, it must destroy that information within 90 days absent a court order or specific consent of the sender of recipient of the information.

IMPACT ON FEDERAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS

The federal government funds the vast majority of state and local stingray programs, attaching one important condition. The feds require agencies acquiring the technology to sign non-disclosure agreements, as alluded to by the Tacoma police chief. 

This throws a giant shroud over the program, even preventing judges, prosecutors and defense attorneys from getting information about the use of stingrays in court. The feds actually instruct prosecutors to withdraw evidence if judges or legislators press for information.The Baltimore Sun reported that last fall, a Baltimore detective refused to answer questions on the stand during a trial, citing a federal non-disclosure agreement.

Defense attorney Joshua Insley asked Cabreja about the agreement.

“Does this document instruct you to withhold evidence from the state’s attorney and Circuit Court, even upon court order to produce?” he asked.

“Yes,” Cabreja said.

As privacysos.org put it, “The FBI would rather police officers and prosecutors let ‘criminals’ go than face a possible scenario where a defendant brings a Fourth Amendment challenge to warrantless stingray spying.”

Read More . . . .

1984 - Spy cameras collecting data at post offices

Post Office Big Brother is Watching You

• Again, the 1984 Big Brother Police Surveillance State is fully and eagerly funded by both the "Liberal" Democrats and the "small government" Republicans in Congress.

DENVER — Within an hour of FOX31 Denver discovering a hidden camera, which was positioned to capture and record the license plates and facial features of customers leaving a Golden Post Office, the device was ripped from the ground and disappeared.

FOX31 Denver investigative reporter Chris Halsne confirmed the hidden camera and recorder is owned and operated by the United State Postal Inspection Service, the law enforcement branch of the U.S. Postal Service.

The recording device appeared to be tripped by any vehicle leaving the property on Johnson Road, but the lens was not positioned to capture images of the front door, employee entrance, or loading dock areas of the post office.

An alert customer first noticed the data collection device, hidden inside a utilities box, around Thanksgiving 2014. It stayed in place, taking photos through the busy Christmas holidays and into mid-January.

Managers inside the post office tell FOX31 Denver they were unaware customers were being photographed outside and that the surveillance was not part of the building’s security monitoring.

A spokesperson for Postal Inspection Service declined to address the specific reason for the domestic surveillance, but admitted the agency had a “number of cameras at their disposal.”

Pamela Durkee, a Federal Law Enforcement Agent and U.S. Postal Inspector, sent an email to FOX31 Denver explaining, “(We) do not engage in routine or random surveillance. Cameras are deployed for law enforcement or security purposes, which may include the security of our facilities, the safety of our customers and employees, or for criminal investigations. Employees of the Postal Inspection Service are sworn to uphold the United States Constitution, including protecting the privacy of the American public.”

FOX31 Denver reviewed criminal search warrants on file in city, county, and federal court but none appeared to be related to the Golden post office camera set-up. The Postal Inspection Service would not confirm or deny that the camera was collecting data for a specific case or cases.

Lee Tien, an attorney for the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, says more and more federal agencies are getting away with conducting surveillance and collecting personal data of citizens without a warrant signed by a judge.

“Part of being a responsible, constitutional government is explaining why it is doing surveillance on its citizens,” Lee told Halsne. “The government should not be collecting this kind of sensitive information. And it is sensitive! It`s about your relationships, your associations with other people, which can be friendship or political or religious. The idea that we give up that privacy simply because we use the U.S. mail is, I think, a silly idea.”

Lee says EFF has been fighting for greater government transparency when it comes to the way agencies like the FBI and the National Security Agency have been vacuuming up massive amounts of cell phone, email and license plates data and storing them in a central computer system.

Lee says, “The idea that they would be able to keep that information forever and search through it whenever they want to – that seems very, very wrong to us because it means you’ll be able to accumulate over time a lot of innocent peoples’ information and then use it in the kinds of ways that would not be overseen by any kind of court or independent third party.”

FOX31 Denver filed multiple Freedom of Information Act requests with the Postal Service, Postal Inspection Service, and Office of the Inspector General in an attempt to identify the cost and scope of the Postal Inspection Service surveillance program.

None of the agencies could provide a written data retention policy, which would detail how long USPIS could keep the images agents have been collecting from the Golden post office camera and other cameras around the Denver area. Similarly, there does not appear to be a policy regarding in what circumstances other federal agencies may have access to the personal information gathered from the cameras.

Our discovery of this camera program comes just months after the U.S. Postal Service was forced to reveal (during a Congressional hearing) that it was videotaping and storing the address and return information from billions of pieces of mail at its distribution centers.

We did locate a California company which claims it sold the U.S. Postal Service “consumer surveillance systems,” which come installed with wireless data retrieval and infrared night capabilities.

Hop-On Incorporated did not return our repeated calls to elaborate on its self-proclaimed deal. Our FOIA requests for federal contracts and financial information about Hop-On and other contractors who sell USPS and USPIS camera equipment were returned to us void of all information.

Read More . . . .