Banks are SHUTTING DOWN (People Losing Their Money)

Fucked By The Federal Reserve

• The Fed sucked off both Trump and Biden and printed trillions to pump up & overheat the economy. Now the Fed is deliberately tanking the economy.
• Will this be the trigger to collapse the banks?

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank is a signal that a Banking Crisis and Depression could hit the US economy in 2023. And the Fed is to blame. Because over the last six months Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve have been sucking money out of the system. The growth in Money Supply (M2) is now officially contracting. Something that has only happened 4 times before in US History. Each time it has happened there was a resulting Depression and Banking Crisis. But what makes the current environment in 2023 even more concerning is that the Fed removed Reserve Requirements for banks during the pandemic. And have not reinstated them. Normally the reserve requirement is 10%. Meaning that the Federal Reserve is not requiring banks to hold cash reserves right now. Something that can cause a banking crisis like we're seeing at Silicon Valley Bank. And something that could also trigger a more widespread depression. Because every time the money supply has contracted over the last 150 years (only 4 times), a deflationary depression has followed.

The Banking Collapse Has Begun

Banksters target internet free speech

The Banksters Target Bitchute

& Freedom of Speech

• For years now the criminals running the banks have been closing down the bank accounts of outspoken real Conservatives like Laura Loomer and Alex Jones . . . and naturally the GOP says and does NOTHING.

• Now the banksters are targeting the free speech video platform Bitchute.com

(Bitchute)  Two years ago, BitChute became the target of an activist group that attempted to shut us down by pressuring our suppliers. As a result, we lost some server hosting, our office space, and other suppliers. We also lost our bank account with HSBC. A bank account we had held in good standing and without any issues since we launched in 2017.

We initially tried to open a new account with a different bank and transfer our money. However, the new bank rejected us just as the funds had reached them. Our money was returned to HSBC, but we could no longer access it, and even today, we still have not retrieved our money from HSBC.

In August 2021, after failing to get a resolution through the HSBC complaints process, we requested arbitration through the UK's banking Ombudsman. We were informed of a long wait due to Covid, which had resulted in many bank-related problems for businesses. It wouldn't be until November 2022 that our case would be assigned. 

Since arbitration started we have provided many details including the bank account where HSBC could send our money. Within a week of handing over that information, that bank account was suspended without notice. 

We informed the Ombudsman that we do not want to give HSBC additional bank accounts and prefer any transfer from HSBC use a third party such as escrow, even a bag of cash would do. A necessary action that will likely lengthen the process.

It's happening again...

That happened 19 days ago, and we still have not been able to get our money from that bank even though we have informed them that we need it urgently to pay bills. It's not clear for what reason they are keeping it.

Now, nearly at the end of 2022, two different banks have our money, HSBC has held it for almost two years.

,

,

About us

BitChute is a politically neutral company that has a diverse community in interests and backgrounds. We require that users only upload legal content that complies with our terms and community guidelines, and we have a team of support staff that ensure that is the case.

BitChute is pro freedom of expression, a universal human right. 

Furthermore, censorship and deplatforming are poor ways to tackle societal problems as they merely create echo chambers that can lead to bigger problems in the long run. It is important to allow people to express all ideas as this exposes them to immediate opposition and allows for a public deconstruction of any flaws they may contain. If you are against bigotry or racism or hateful ideologies, you should be for freedom of expression.

"Reputational risk"

In recent years financial institutions have been using "reputational risk" to stealthily engage in political discrimination. If a financial institution takes action against a lawful company for its commitment to freedom of expression, that should be a very real reputational and material risk for the financial institution.

The idea that people or companies can be excluded from the monetary system and have their assets frozen over an opinion or lawful actions is despicable. This discrimination must be wholeheartedly rejected if we are to keep free and open societies.

Please spread the word about the unfairness of this, and share this anywhere you can. Let content creators know this is a worthy topic for a video. If you would like to contact HSBC about this or for any reason you can find their contact details here: https://www.hsbc.co.uk/contact/

I wish you all and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year and any other holiday you might celebrate.

Ray Vahey - BitChute Founder and Chief Executive

Bitchute

Set Up State Banks To Avoid The Feds

 

Food inflation hits 40% as CPI explodes

The Banks are reducing us to poverty

(Natural News) Food inflation is exploding as much as 40% year over year (for fresh and dried vegetables) while today’s CPI number is deemed a catastrophe for the Biden administration and its disastrous economic failures. 

On Wednesday, the PPI (Producer Price Index) rose 0.4% for the month, twice the expected amount, and today’s CPI print reveals a shocking 8.2% year-over-year inflation rate, the highest in 40 years.

The highest price increases are being seen in food, airfare, natural gas, health insurance and public transportation. Butter is up 32.2% and eggs are up 30.5%. A Breitbart news story reveals more shocking numbers: (note the nearly 16% increase in vegetable prices in just one month…)

– Fresh and dried vegetables: up 15.7 percent for the month and 40.2 percent for the year.
– Grains: up 10.7 percent for the month and 30.4 percent for the year.
– Fresh eggs: up 16.7 percent for the month and 97.3 percent for the year.
– Bakery products: up 0.8 percent for the month and 14.0 percent for the year.
– Pasta: up 1.1 percent for the month and 34.1 percent for the year.

This is, of course, exactly what happens when a tyrannical, economically illiterate government wages war on food, farmers and fertilizer while engaging in insane levels of money printing that accelerate the collapse of the value of the dollar.

Understand that “inflation” isn’t even the right word for this. It should rightly be called central bank theft from the people, because that’s largely where this phenomenon comes from. Except, in this case, there are also fundamental food shortages at play which have been engineered into the system to cause scarcity and famine.

So we really have a combination of a central bank financial cartel looting everybody’s currency and a criminal, illegitimate government that’s actively destroying the energy infrastructure that’s necessary for fertilizer and farming.

The end result is, of course, entirely predictable: Widespread starvation and an eventual mass uprising across America as people can no longer afford to eat.

NaturalNews.com

End the Fed? Audit the Fed? AUDIT THE GOLD!

Trump channels Hamilton and Jackson says Bannon

The Problem is the Oligarchs Own Congress

(Breitbart)  -  Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon told Charlie Rose that President Donald Trump combined Jacksonian populism and Hamiltonian economic nationalism to galvanize working-class Americans of all backgrounds to win the White House.

Rose aired Bannon’s remarks on his much-heralded Charlie Rose Show on PBS on Tuesday evening. The esteemed CBS anchor interviewed Bannon for 60 Minutes, and he also aired some of his interview with the Breitbart News executive chairman on his interview program on Monday evening as well.

When Rose asked Bannon to define the populism that got Trump elected, Bannon told him  that “populism is anti-elitism. Anti-crony capitalism.”

“It is basically the voice of the people of this country saying that there is a corrupt permanent political class in Washington, DC, inextricably linked to the financiers on wall Street and the high-tech community in Silicon Valley and in Hollywood,” Bannon said.

He added that these elites “rule us” in order to “spite what we want to happen” and commit “economic hate crime[s]” against American workers. Bannon spoke about the country’s industrial and manufacturing base being “exported overseas” while Asia’s middle class rises “at the expense of the working-class people in this country.”

“What Donald Trump was able to galvanize is kinda what i call Jacksonian populism, which is always very, very concerned about an elite in Washington, DC, with … Hamiltonian economic nationalism,” Bannon said. “The two great forces of 19th century politics have really been combined in this modern movement.”

Bannon further defined the three basic “touchstones” of Trump’s movement: 1) stop mass immigration and cut back dramatically on legal immigration; 2) bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States; 3) get us out of these pointless foreign wars.

He said these were the “three broad categories’ of Trump’s movement and added, “you are going to see that time and again.”

Bannon also said Trump resonated with Breitbart News’ readers and defeated the most talented Republican presidential field in history because of his positions on trade and illegal immigration. Bannon also told Rose that Breitbart News is a throwback to 19th century newspapers that openly stated their positions on issues.

“We’re very anti-elite. And the reason is the elites are incompetent,” Bannon said. “If they were so smart, we would be in a better situation. They are complete and totally incompetent.”

Bannon also added that, “We’re populist. We’re economic nationalists. We believe in America First. We don’t believe in a lot of foreign intervention that’s not in the vital national security interests of the United States.”

Read More . . . .

Dems adopt Lenin-Stalin Day, Dump Democrat Party founder Andrew Jackson

Dems Approve Lenin-Stalin Day Dinner

• We Hamiltonians here at The Federalist heartily stand behind the decision of the Connecticut Democrat Party to dump Thomas Jefferson from their annual dinner.
• On the other hand, what a bunch of fucking retards.  These politically correct Democrat morons dumped Andrew Jackson the founder of the Democrat Party.

(Connecticut Post)  -  Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson are history in Connecticut.

Under pressure from the NAACP, the state Democratic Party will scrub the names of the two presidents from its annual fundraising dinner because of their ties to slavery.

Democrat Party founder Jackson is dumped

Party leaders voted unanimously Wednesday night in Hartford to rename the Jefferson Jackson Bailey dinner in the aftermath of last month’s fatal shooting of nine worshipers at the historic black church in Charleston, S.C.

The decision is believed to be unprecedented and could prompt Democrats in other states with similarly-named events to follow suit.

“I see it as the right thing to do,” Nick Balletto, the party’s first-year chairman, told Hearst Connecticut Media Wednesday night. “I wasn’t looking to be a trailblazer or set off a trend that’s going to affect the rest of the country. Hopefully, they’ll follow suit when they see it’s the right thing to do.”

Read More . . . .

Thank God the Balanced Budget Amendment is dead



President Andrew Jackson had no problem balancing the Federal budget and paying off the national debt at the same time.  But the modern political hacks do not have the guts to do either.  They are cowards. 


The truth is the truth . . .

"I am one of those who do not believe that a national debt is a national blessing, but rather a curse to a republic; inasmuch as it is calculated to raise around the administration a moneyed aristocracy dangerous to the liberties of the country."
--- President Andrew Jackson

"A constitutional amendment is not a path to a balanced budget.  It is only an excuse for members of this body failing to cast votes to achieve one."

--- Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas  (2011)

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."
--- Marcus Tullius Cicero, Consul of the Roman Republic

__________________________________________________________________________

The phony Balanced Budget Amendment is dead

By Gary;

The House voted 261-165 in favor of the measure to require annual balanced budgets, but that was 23 short of the two-thirds majority needed to advance a constitutional amendment.

In all, 235 Republicans and 25 Democrats voted for the amendment, four Republicans and 161 Democrats opposed it. The other two Republicans voting no were Justin Amash of Michigan and Louie Gohmert of Texas.

An amendment is not needed.  (Ask Andrew Jackson.)  Congress can balance the budget today if they wanted to.  All they have to do is adopt the U.S. Budget for 2006 when spending levels were lower.  How hard it that? 

Thank God this idiotic amendment is dead. 



Bo Diddley
"Don't let your mouth write no check that
your tail can't cash."



GET IT DONE NOW 

The Elite hacks and liars in the Beltway need to finally take responsibility for their actions.  Big Spending Socialist Government has to end.  They need to slash entitlements, slash spending and pay down the national debt. 

No more.  No less. 

No kicking the can down the road with a constitutional amendment that might, maybe, be approved by the states in 3 to 7 years.  They need to do the job they are paid for right now. 

DANGER TO THE REPUBLIC   

The Founding Fathers did not want a super majority to be needed to pass a budget or go into debt.  What that can do is create a dictatorship of the minority.

Power would no longer be in the hands of the people's representatives based on a majority vote.  Instead the power to bring the nation to its' knees would be held by a tiny minority.

For example, if a two-thirds vote was needed to pass an unbalanced budget.  The budget could pass the House 435 to 0 and die in the Senate with only 34 no votes.

A tiny minority of 34 Senators voting as a block could hold the entire nation hostage to their demands.  The  government would grind to a halt.

The answer is not to give an insane minority the power to block the business of a nation.  The answer is for the majority to do the job they are paid to do.  No more excuses.


Cowards on Parade
The Congressional Balanced Budget Amendment Caucus  -  a collect of total cowards who are afraid of personally casting the votes needed to cut spending and get a dirty job done.