.

NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT

"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Monday, November 11, 2019

Court orders IRS to fess up about seized properties



The American Police State


(WND)  -  A federal appeals court has ordered the Internal Revenue Service to provide information about the properties it seizes.

The ruling came in a lawsuit by the Institute for Justice seeking information about the IRS forfeiture program, including what properties it takes and what it does with them.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, unanimously siding with IJ, said the IRS cannot deliberately frustrate Freedom of Information Act requests by quibbling over immaterial technicalities.

"The court also ruled that the IRS must put the effort into determining which records are public, rather than applying blanket exemptions to whole swaths of data that may or may not be exempt from disclosure," IJ said.


"The lack of transparency surrounding forfeiture is deeply troubling, especially considering the vast power federal agencies have to take property from people without so much as charging them with a crime," said IJ Senior Research Analyst Jennifer McDonald. "The public ought to know how the IRS is using forfeiture."

Kentucky man battles against asset forfeiture laws




The case began in 2015 when IJ sought records from the IRS regarding its "Asset Forfeiture Tracking and Retrieval System."

First, the IRS tried to charge IJ more than $750,000 in fees for its requested information.

But IJ sued, and the agency reversed its decision and then claimed AFTRAK "is not actually a database and therefore cannot possibly contain records."

The agency then produced one standard forfeiture report that was 99% blacked out.

But at the 2nd Circuit, Senior Circuit Judge Williams scolded the agency for its tactics.

"A request certainly should not fail where the agency knew or should have known what the requestor was seeking all along," he found.

He said the IRS will have to turn over all the data the IRS possesses that falls within the request.

Read More . . . .



No comments: