"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Friday, August 17, 2018

FRAUD? Fake numbers? Facebook misled advertisers with inflated ‘potential reach,’ lawsuit says

Fuck Zuck

  • I have used Facebook ads for my business. On my administrative page I can see so-called "activity" of people clicking through to my website. But I am not making any money from these ads. So I wonder if Facebook uses "bots" to click on ads to make advertisers think customers are engaging with your business.
  • Also when I run a newspaper ad I can see it. I can hold a physical copy in my hands. With an Internet "ad" how do I know it even ran?

(East Bay Times)  -  Facebook allegedly misled advertisers on its platform by demonstrating it had a far larger audience size in U.S. cities and states than it actually had, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday.
The lawsuit, filed by a Kansas-based aromatherapy fashionwear business owner, alleged Facebook ballooned its “Potential Reach” number for how many users were targeted by an advertisement, thereby misleading advertisers to purchase more advertisements than they might otherwise have.
The lawsuit from owner Danielle Singer alleges that Facebook’s purported Potential Reach figures for the 18-34 age demographic in all 50 states exceeded the actual population of 18-34 year olds who use Facebook.
The lawsuit also says it received testimony from former Facebook employees confirming the inflation. One anonymous employee said the Potential Reach number was “like a made-up PR number.”
“Facebook’s misrepresentation of the Potential Reach of its advertisements induced advertising purchasers, including Plaintiffs, to continue purchasing advertisements, because purchased believed that more people could potentially be reached by their advertisements than possibly could have been,” reads the lawsuit.
A Facebook spokesperson told this news organization that “this suit is without merit and we plan to defend ourselves vigorously.”
The lawsuit was filed with the U.S. District Court of Northern California and seeks class action status from those who purchased advertisements on Facebook from 2013 onwards. Facebook was sued on two counts: a violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law and as a “quasi-contract claim for restitution.”
Singer, who owns Therapy Threads, spent more than $14,000 on Facebook ads across the country, targeting major metropolises, such as San Francisco.
Singer then did her own calculations comparing the Potential Reach figures — which Facebook says is “designed to estimate how many people in a given area could see an ad” and not designed to match population or census estimates — with her actual figures. For example, in Chicago, Singer deduced from U.S. census data that there were about 808,000 residents aged between 18 and 34; Facebook calculated its Potential Reach for Chicagoans in the same age group to be more than 1.9 million.
“Even this calculation understates the level of inflation in Chicago, since not everyone in the demographic has a Facebook account,” reads the lawsuit.
For other similar calculations for states such as California and cities such as San Jose, the lawsuit took publicly available figures in addition to census data to roughly estimate how many 18-34 year olds actually live in the United States to compare against Facebook’s Potential Reach.
One study the lawsuit cites for its calculation was the Pew Research Center’s “Social Media Use 2018” study, in which Pew Research Center polled 2,002 U.S. adults on their social media habits. Sixty-eight percent of polled adults said they used Facebook, and three-quarters of Facebook users said they checked Facebook on a daily basis.
Read More . . . .

No comments: