.

NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT

"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Thursday, February 27, 2020

Democrats demand "gender neutral" clothes be sold by stores


Gender neutral clothes for all

1984 is Here
"We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends .... Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother."
George Orwell



(Yahoo News)  -  If passed, a California bill introduced last week would require some large retailers to have gender-neutral areas for children’s apparel and toys within their stores.
Assembly Bill 2826 would require retail stores that carry children’s clothing and shoes, toys and/or other childcare items to include some floor space where all products are displayed, regardless of whether those goods have been traditionally marked for girls or boys.
Introduced by California Democrat State Assemblymember Evan Low, the bill would apply only to department stores with 500 or more employees. The bill would go into effect beginning in 2023 and carry a civil penalty of $1,000.
Low proposed this legislation with the aim of making the shopping experience more inclusive for kids, with the bill reading: “Unjustified differences in similar products that are traditionally marketed either for girls or for boys can be more easily identified by the consumer if similar items are displayed closer to one another in one, undivided area of the retail sales floor.”
“Keeping similar items that are traditionally marketed either for girls or for boys separated makes it more difficult for the consumer to compare the products and incorrectly implies that their use by one gender is inappropriate,” the text continues.
Read More . . . .



No comments: