Using the institutions of government to re-distribute the wealth in an endless quest to buy votes. |
Socialism - Democrats stealing the wealth of the producers to buy the votes of those "with needs"
- Billions of your tax dollars used to pay down the debt of voters . . . I mean homeowners.
- The government will increase from $50,000 to $100,000 the amount of aid borrowers can receive to pay down their mortgage.
- Why stop there? Let's pay down everyone's car loans and credit cards.
.
Comrade President Obama is directing his Fellow Travelers in the Beltway to pay down people's home mortgage debt in the endless quest for votes.
.
Just this week in the Golden State the government owned mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have signed on to Keep Your Home California, a $2 billion program where the Socialist Feds will pay down your home loan with other people's money.
.
The initiative uses federal funds from the 2008 Wall Street bailout.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own about 62% of outstanding mortgages in the Golden State reports the Los Angeles Times.
.
The state will allocate the federal money, resulting in help for fewer California borrowers than the 25,135 that was originally proposed. The $2-billion program is run by the California Housing Finance Agency, with $790 million available for principal reductions. Only a small number of California homeowners — 8,500 to 9,000 — would be able to get mortgage write-downs with the current level of funds available.
.
The two mortgage giants were seized by the federal government in 2008 as they bordered on bankruptcy, and taxpayers have provided $188 billion to keep them afloat.
.
Fannie and Freddie last year made it their policy to participate in state-run principal reduction programs such as Keep Your Home California as long as they or the mortgage companies that work for them don't have to contribute funds.
.
Banks and other financial institutions have been reluctant to participate in widespread principal reductions. Lenders argue that such reductions aren't worth the cost and would create a "moral hazard" by rewarding delinquent borrowers.
(Los Angeles Times)
No comments:
Post a Comment